• Welcome to the LOSRA Website

    Welcome to the LOSRA Website

    The Lower Sunbury Residents' Association Read More
  • Become a Member

    Become a Member

    We invite anybody interested in the issues facing Lower Sunbury to subscribe Read More
  • View Our Newletters

    View Our Newletters

    You can find all the recent LOSRA Newsletter available to download Read More
  • LOSRA's Aims

    LOSRA's Aims

    To optimise and enhance the quality of life for Lower Sunbury residents by all appropriate means Read More
  • Sunbury As It Was

    Sunbury As It Was

    Visit the LOSRA Gallery for images past and Present Read More
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Monday, 17 September 2018 08:13

DART HOUSE, Thames Street - LOSRA to Oppose 7 Flat Development

Rate this item
(0 votes)

It is highly regrettable that advice of this application (dated 2.08.18) was not made known to local residents and no public notice had been posted on the front of the building (a requirement which should have beem met by the applicant). A number of residents discovered simply by word of mouth. Nevertheless, we are where we are and time is now very limited as representations must be submitted by 19.09.18. This said, we are aware that late submissions will be considered provided they are received before determination.

Whilst LoSRA will be opposing this application, it is essential that all interested parties make their views known, no matter how briefly, by going to: Spelthorne Planning Applications Online, and search for Dart House. Application 18/01186/FUL.

Click here to view the application

The grounds on which our opposition is being formulated will include the following:

Adequacy of Parking/Loading/Turning

LOSRA understands that, in accordance with the Supplementary Planning Document 2011 on parking standards, a development of this size outside a town centre should include provisions for at least 12 off-street parking spaces. This proposal shows six underground parking bays, accessible via a lift/turntable system from street level. This is clearly woefully inadequate and non-compliant with planning guidance. Options for on-street parking simply don’t exist in this locality.

Design, Appearance and Materials

Whilst the architectural sketches make selected reference to the existing street scene, and the potential reuse of original brickwork, the concept design clearly demonstrates a desire to introduce modern features to the building façade including: 

  • Anodised aluminium window frames, panels and dormer cheeks
  • Obscure anodised aluminium panelling
  • Rendered diagonal recessing
  • Shuttered ( presumably metallic) garage doors
  • LOSRA believes that these architectural features would be totally incongruous with the surrounding street scene, and the adjoining properties.

Effect on Conservation Areas

The Lower Sunbury Conservation Area is a special feature of our village, and is dear to the hearts of our residents. This site is the first riverside architectural feature on the western aspect of the Conservation Area and therefore defines the character and appearance which LOSRA endeavour to preserve. Furthermore, with the site being situated on the bank of the river Thames, and adjacent to Flower Pot Green, it is part of a vista that has been celebrated in photographs and painting (Daphne Clements amongst others). Accordingly, we believe the site must be protected from this type of development, and that the proposal to demolish the building in these circumstances  is wholly inappropriate for the Conservation Area.

Effect on Listed Buildings

Unsurprisingly, due to its prominent location within the Conservation Area, this site is adjacent to a cluster of listed buildings, including The Flower Pot Pub, Northolt, Thames Cottage and Riverside House. The site is also in the immediate vicinity of the grade II listed St Mary’s Church, The Old Vicarage, Old Manor Farm Cottage and Sunbury Nursing Lodge.

Policy EN5 (f) requires “development proposals for any sites affecting the setting of a listed building to have special regard to the need to preserve its setting.”  The appearance of the proposed building will destroy the current visual balance of the approach into Sunbury from the West: it has no relationship to the Flower Pot or any of the other buildings in the street, let alone as part of the framing for a view of the church. The proposed design is both highly obtrusive and out of character and harmony within the conservation setting.

Highway safety

This property is directly alongside a busy roundabout, where unfortunately there have been a large number of accidents, including a recent pedestrian fatality. LOSRA encourage both the County Highways Authority and the Planning Officer to consider the proposal very carefully. LOSRA believe that the proposed development is both impractical and unsafe.

Layout and density of buildings

The development plans present a much larger building than the existing property, both in terms of footprint and the height. LOSRA believes this constitutes a substantial overdevelopment of the site that would significantly increase the density of buildings within that corner of the Lower Sunbury Conservation Area.

Overbearing & Overshadowing

Policy EN1 (b) requires that the building “achieves a satisfactory relationship to adjoining properties avoiding significant harmful impact in terms of loss of privacy, daylight or sunlight, or overbearing effect due to bulk and proximity of outlook.”

This proposal represents a drastic increase of both the footprint and the height of the building. We believe that this would have a negative impact on the relationship with adjoining properties. We also submit that, given the site location and orientation relative to Flower Pot Green, the building would have a harmful impact on the amount of sunlight reaching important designated common land within the Lower Sunbury Conservation Area.

Previous planning decisions

A pertinent comment on a previous proposal for developing the site, made by the Council’s (then) Listed Buildings and Conservation Officer: “We have particular concern about the starkness of the proposed building and in particular the modern designed roof…” The sentiment is every bit as valid in respect of the proposed development.

We are at pains to point out that our Association is not necessarily opposed to the development of this site; but what is proposed in this application represents an over-development in scale which is completely out of sympathy with the street scene and out of character in the Lower Sunbury Conservation Area.

3 comments

  • Comment Link Shirley McBreen Monday, 17 September 2018 21:52 posted by Shirley McBreen

    Comment Link Shirley McBreenMonday, 17 September 2018 21:48 posted by Shirley McBreen
    This planning proposal is totally unsuitable for this location and would be extremely detrimental to the character of our village and the neighbouring properties.
    It would also have an impact on Flower Pot Green. This is a beautiful spot and used by many families and visitors to the area.
    This property is based on an already busy junction. More traffic would add yet more pollution to this area.
    There is never any thought given to improvement in the infrastructure, we already have stretched medical facilities and schools.
    Residents work hard to keep our riverside village a pleasant place to live and visit.
    I think more consideration should be given to residents and their opinions MORE OPENLY before anything like this development is even put before the planning committee.

  • Comment Link Shirley McBreen Monday, 17 September 2018 21:48 posted by Shirley McBreen

    This planning proposal is totally unsuitable for this location and would be extremely detrimental to the character of our village and the neighbouring properties.
    It would also have an impact on Flower Pot Green. This is a beautiful spot and used by many families and visitors to the area.
    This property is based on an already busy junction. More traffic would add yet more pollution to this area.
    There is never any thought given to improvement in the infrastructure, we already have stretched medical facilities and schools.
    Residents work hard to keep our riverside village a pleasant place to live and visit.
    I think more consideration should be given to residents and their opinions MORE OPENLY before anything like this development is even put before the planning committee.

  • Comment Link Mary Creaby Monday, 17 September 2018 20:57 posted by Mary Creaby

    Construction of these flats would add to the traffic and pollution of a very busy junction, and this area already has too much traffic driving through it, and actually goes by the name of 'Sunbury Village' not 'Sunbury City'! This is a totally unacceptable construction. More consideration needs to be given to the health of Sunbury residents with regard to pollution, current well overstretched medical facilities, road conditions, and schools. With this in mind, I strongly oppose this latest proposal. It seems wherever there is a flat space in Sunbury, developers feel they must build on it. It's about time, the health of the residents in Sunbury, is put before the wealth of property developers.

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.

Subscribe for 2018

Join Our Mailing List

Latest Local News